Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency clean-publish to v7#158

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/clean-publish-7.x
Open

chore(deps): update dependency clean-publish to v7#158
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/clean-publish-7.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 25, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
clean-publish ^5.0.0^7.0.0 age confidence

Release Notes

shashkovdanil/clean-publish (clean-publish)

v7.1.0

Compare Source

v7.0.1

Compare Source

  • Fixed npm package size regression.

v7.0.0

Compare Source

  • Added pnpm-workspace.yaml to ignore files.
  • Removed Node.js 20 support.

v6.0.5

Compare Source

  • Ignore oxfmt and oxlint configs.

v6.0.4

Compare Source

  • Ignore .prettierignore file.

v6.0.3

Compare Source

  • Added pnpm to ignore package.json fields.

v6.0.2

Compare Source

  • Ignore .claude folder.

v6.0.1

Compare Source

v6.0.0

Compare Source

  • Removed Node.js 18 support.
  • Reduced dependencies (by @​hyperz111).

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/clean-publish-7.x branch from 86643f0 to 09711cc Compare June 1, 2026 16:36
@renovate renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/clean-publish-7.x branch from 09711cc to d12c07b Compare June 1, 2026 22:31
@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

renovate Bot commented Jun 1, 2026

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: pnpm-lock.yaml
Scope: all 9 workspace projects
? Verifying lockfile against supply-chain policies (743 entries)...
✗ Lockfile failed supply-chain policy check (743 entries in 5.9s)
[ERR_PNPM_MINIMUM_RELEASE_AGE_VIOLATION] 29 lockfile entries failed verification:
  @oxlint/binding-android-arm-eabi@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:31.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-android-arm64@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:00.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-darwin-arm64@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:05:55.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-darwin-x64@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:19.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-freebsd-x64@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:30.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:37.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-arm-musleabihf@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:43.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-gnu@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:13.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-arm64-musl@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:19.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:55.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-gnu@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:01.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-riscv64-musl@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:06.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-s390x-gnu@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:13.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-x64-gnu@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:38.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-linux-x64-musl@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:45.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-openharmony-arm64@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:25.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-win32-arm64-msvc@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:06.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-win32-ia32-msvc@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:06:48.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @oxlint/binding-win32-x64-msvc@1.68.0 was published at 2026-06-01T17:07:25.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  @vitest/expect@4.1.8 was published at 2026-06-01T08:14:36.000Z, within the minimumReleaseAge cutoff (2026-05-31T22:31:43.155Z)
  …and 9 more

The lockfile contains entries that the active policies reject. This can mean the lockfile is stale, or that someone committed a lockfile that bypassed the policy locally — inspect recent changes to pnpm-lock.yaml before trusting it. If the changes look expected, run "pnpm clean --lockfile" and then "pnpm install" to rebuild from a fresh resolution. Alternatively, relax the policy that flagged them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants